<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Natalieurq's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natalieurq.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natalieurq.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on one last note in emerson by Peter Kerry Powers</title>
		<link>http://natalieurq.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/one-last-note-in-emerson/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kerry Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natalieurq.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Very interesting question, Natalie.  And I love the Jimi Hendrix video.  Good instincts.  The relationship between transcendentalism and the countercultural movement has been discussed a good deal, but you&#039;re right to notice that Emerson, and indeed several of the Transcendentalists, were almost ascetics when it came to this kind of thing.  A purity of soul led to a natural &quot;high&quot; so to speak.  Of course, other romantics were more taken with drugs.  Coleridge supposedly wrote Kubla Khan on an opium high.  Does it make any difference to how we judge the poem as literature?  That&#039;s a very difficult and interesting question. How much do we think the poem is a record of the poet&#039;s conscious creativity;  and if a poem is not in the poet&#039;s conscious control and manipulation of language, why do we give poet&#039;s so much credit.  A good thing to think about when you come to T.S. Eliot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting question, Natalie.  And I love the Jimi Hendrix video.  Good instincts.  The relationship between transcendentalism and the countercultural movement has been discussed a good deal, but you&#8217;re right to notice that Emerson, and indeed several of the Transcendentalists, were almost ascetics when it came to this kind of thing.  A purity of soul led to a natural &#8220;high&#8221; so to speak.  Of course, other romantics were more taken with drugs.  Coleridge supposedly wrote Kubla Khan on an opium high.  Does it make any difference to how we judge the poem as literature?  That&#8217;s a very difficult and interesting question. How much do we think the poem is a record of the poet&#8217;s conscious creativity;  and if a poem is not in the poet&#8217;s conscious control and manipulation of language, why do we give poet&#8217;s so much credit.  A good thing to think about when you come to T.S. Eliot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello world! by Mr WordPress</title>
		<link>http://natalieurq.wordpress.com/2008/02/06/hello-world/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Hi, this is a comment.&lt;br /&gt;To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#039; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a comment.<br />To delete a comment, just log in, and view the posts&#8217; comments, there you will have the option to edit or delete them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
